<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Learn FreeNAS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Free Network Attached Storage OS</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Connect to Your FreeNAS Server via SSH Without A Password; Password Free Logins via Public Key Authentication by Roger Heathcote</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2009/07/22/how-to-connect-to-your-freenas-server-via-ssh-without-a-password-password-free-logins-via-public-key-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Heathcote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=236#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Thanks, very helpful article.

It bears mentioning that to benefit from the improved security of using certificate based authentication you need to go into the web GUI to Services &#124; SSH and untick "Enable keyboard-interactive authentication."

If you don't disable password based logins you will have improved convenience but no better security. Technically it may be even worse as there are now two attack vectors!

Also it is worth changing the default port if only as to spare your logs the constant barrage of failed brute force attempts. Strangely the command line argument for specifying a port is different between ssh (-p) and scp (-P), both choke if the wrong case is used, lord knows why that's how it is on my Ubuntu box!

Also, I found that I needed to manually create the users ".ssh folder" and "authorized_keys" file manually before the "cat ~/id_rsa.pub &gt;&gt; ~/.ssh/authorized_keys" line would work.

Anyway, thanks again &amp; keep up the good work :)

Roger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, very helpful article.</p>
<p>It bears mentioning that to benefit from the improved security of using certificate based authentication you need to go into the web GUI to Services | SSH and untick &#8220;Enable keyboard-interactive authentication.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t disable password based logins you will have improved convenience but no better security. Technically it may be even worse as there are now two attack vectors!</p>
<p>Also it is worth changing the default port if only as to spare your logs the constant barrage of failed brute force attempts. Strangely the command line argument for specifying a port is different between ssh (-p) and scp (-P), both choke if the wrong case is used, lord knows why that&#8217;s how it is on my Ubuntu box!</p>
<p>Also, I found that I needed to manually create the users &#8220;.ssh folder&#8221; and &#8220;authorized_keys&#8221; file manually before the &#8220;cat ~/id_rsa.pub &gt;&gt; ~/.ssh/authorized_keys&#8221; line would work.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again &amp; keep up the good work <img src='http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Roger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeNAS 0.8 Roadmap by Massimo</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2010/02/24/freenas-08-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Massimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=306#comment-911</guid>
		<description>DJango!? ... why Django? ... Isn't it more heavy?
I mean I would like to listen some reason behind this decision.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJango!? &#8230; why Django? &#8230; Isn&#8217;t it more heavy?<br />
I mean I would like to listen some reason behind this decision.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning FreeNAS Book by Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/learning-freenas-book/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?page_id=93#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Is there an update with ZFS concepts?

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an update with ZFS concepts?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeNAS 0.8 Roadmap by Do It Yourself NAS &#187; Archive &#187; FreeNAS 0.8 Roadmap</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2010/02/24/freenas-08-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Do It Yourself NAS &#187; Archive &#187; FreeNAS 0.8 Roadmap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=306#comment-903</guid>
		<description>[...] Learn FreeNAS » FreeNAS 0.8 Roadmap     [Comments (0)]&#160; [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Learn FreeNAS » FreeNAS 0.8 Roadmap     [Comments (0)]&nbsp; [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeNAS 0.7.1 Released by kingcharles</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2010/02/19/freenas-071-released/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>kingcharles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=302#comment-902</guid>
		<description>It is listed under the nightly builds, so to me it does not appear to be a stable release.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is listed under the nightly builds, so to me it does not appear to be a stable release.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeNAS and ESX 3.5 Performance by Ben Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2008/11/19/freenas-and-esx-35-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=42#comment-792</guid>
		<description>The E1000 change doubled read and write performance for me.  Good enough to keep my lab going.  Going to try with OpenFiler as well.

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E1000 change doubled read and write performance for me.  Good enough to keep my lab going.  Going to try with OpenFiler as well.</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rumours of FreeNAS&#8217; Death Greatly Exaggerated by aka-none</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2009/12/05/rumours-of-freenas-death-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>aka-none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=300#comment-771</guid>
		<description>WOW!This is GREAT news.

I've been holding back on the ZFS as I didn't want to commit to it, but this will be sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!This is GREAT news.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been holding back on the ZFS as I didn&#8217;t want to commit to it, but this will be sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeNAS 0.8 to Use Linux not FreeBSD by David</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2009/11/21/freenas-08-to-use-linux-not-freebsd/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=298#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Nice post, I agree, no ZFS = not really an option for a good working NAS.
I’ve got FreeNAS running, version .7 and if it wasn’t for ZFS I probably would run a stock opensolaris install.
FreeNAS is an excellent product and the Web Gui is first class and easy to use, but without ZFS? No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, I agree, no ZFS = not really an option for a good working NAS.<br />
I’ve got FreeNAS running, version .7 and if it wasn’t for ZFS I probably would run a stock opensolaris install.<br />
FreeNAS is an excellent product and the Web Gui is first class and easy to use, but without ZFS? No thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeNAS 0.8 to Use Linux not FreeBSD by hari wibowo</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/2009/11/21/freenas-08-to-use-linux-not-freebsd/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>hari wibowo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?p=298#comment-686</guid>
		<description>awesome it is a super info
txs alot my bro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome it is a super info<br />
txs alot my bro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FAQ by E Hepler</title>
		<link>http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/freenas-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>E Hepler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learnfreenas.com/blog/?page_id=64#comment-683</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="#comment-396" rel="nofollow"&gt;@Eric Lightbody&lt;/a&gt; 

If you setup 3 drives of 2x1TB and 1x640GB I think you'll get a raid system built on 3 drives using 3x640GB with no failover.  I'd wait till you get 2 additional 1TB drives, and make the array 4x1TB.  Otherwise the Raid is pretty ineffective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-396" rel="nofollow">@Eric Lightbody</a> </p>
<p>If you setup 3 drives of 2&#215;1TB and 1&#215;640GB I think you&#8217;ll get a raid system built on 3 drives using 3&#215;640GB with no failover.  I&#8217;d wait till you get 2 additional 1TB drives, and make the array 4&#215;1TB.  Otherwise the Raid is pretty ineffective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
